Monthly Archives: June 2011

Notes from Rev. Kenn – June 9, 2011

I am excited about this year’s General Assembly. Not just because it’s our 50th Anniversary of the consolidation of the Universalist Church in America and the American Unitarian Association. Although that’s pretty cool.

What excites me is a recovery and reaffirmation of our Universalist theology. Unitarian theology may be the gate through which many disaffected by orthodoxy enter our congregations in search of a reasoned and genuine religious alternative. But once you are through that gate, the debate over how many parts God does or doesn’t have — 1, 3, none! — is not interesting nor life shaping for very long.

It is our faith conviction in the worth of all souls that keeps us going. We have a proud heritage of standing on the side of both love and human dignity. Our faith has called us many a time to stand with those marginalized by the larger society — dismantling slavery, legitimating women’s voices for society, bringing an end to segregation, affirming the humanity of gay and lesbian people and, increasingly, walking our talk vis a vis immigration and the rights of migrants. How good to know we can be counted on to show up and resist injustice whenever and wherever it appears. “Standing on the Side of Love” is not just a new popular hymn. It is an affirmation of our core values.

I see a resurgence of Universalist teaching as our UUA turns 50. Recall, our ancestors asserted that, whatever else the it was/is, the holy is found in loving action. Hence, we were known as the “no hell” church and the “love church,” in part because we could not believe a true god would create us frail and then sentence us to eternal torment for our failings. Salvation had to be for all! Today, that translates to a faith that never gives up on anyone. It is one that calls us to know and live the truth: each and all are loved, lovable, and able to love. (We’ll save for another time discussing just how hard that can be.)

At the time of the consolidation there was a justified fear the more numerous Unitarians would swallow up the Universalists. Too often, we have short-handed our name to Unitarian, reflecting that bias. Yet, the truly inspiring teaching among us is the call to affirm and to promote human dignity for all souls. The Free Church (oh, had we renamed ourselves that!) is vital and our future is bright as we become known once again and live more fully what it means to be “the love church.”

May love bless you and keep you. And may you give it, always in all ways. Rev. Kenn

PS: Scholar Karen Armstrong delivers the Ware Lecture at GA this year. Check out her “Charter for                                                     Compassion” (www.charterforcompassion.org) for a modern version of pure Universalist teaching.
PPS: If you cannot attend GA, be sure to check out the UUA website for live streaming, podcasts, and daily reports on the Assembly.

Notes from Rev. Randy – June 9, 2011

I want to challenge your thinking just a little bit.

It seems to me that most religions can trace their existence back to some point at which they differentiated themselves from others. Worshippers of Yahweh not Baal. Christians not Jews. Muslims not Christians. Unitarians not Trinitarians.

From that point of differentiation, institutional religious development focuses on the ways in which the gathered community remembers, respects, honors, and extends that differentiation in story, song, worship, art, music, and all the elements of expression.

The vision, the goal, as it were, of each religious tradition is to embody the universal in the most meaningful past form of the particular. (Yes, I know, a careful reading of this sentence will suggest its oxymoronic nature . . . or at least its ironic nature.)

So, we learn to teach our story (“this is my story, this is my song,. .”; “this little light of mine. . .”) as a central element of our religious education.

But what if we inverted the process, and rather than focus on what makes us different, we focused on what connects us, and therefore leads us to the universal. What would religious education look like if it were based on the inclusive, empowering, multi-cultural, accepting, welcoming world we envision?

Who would be the heros and heroines of such an approach?
What would be the sacred sources?
How could one form an identity based on vision rather than heritage?

I would love to hear from y’all as I explore this idea in my summer musings and ponderings. We claim to be a religion of vision and values – help to shape a new understanding of how that can be communicated, explored, and understood by all ages.

Randy Becker, your Acting Lifespan Program Consultant

UUA Florida District

Promote Your Page Too

Tags